Information Disclosure Based on TCFD Recommendations
Information Disclosure Based on TCFD Recommendations
Recognizing that protecting the global environment is a crucial issue common to all humanity, our company strives to harmonize business activities with environmental conservation and reduces environmental impact through environmentally conscious business practices.
In 2015, we endorsed the recommendations compiled by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), established by the Financial Stability Board (FSB). We analyzed and assessed the risks that climate change poses to financial markets and have been disclosing information in accordance with the "governance," "risk management," "strategy," and "metrics and targets" recommended by the TCFD since fiscal year 2022. In fiscal year 2024, we conducted a review with the participation of external experts.
Governance
Our company has established a "Sustainability Committee," chaired by the President and CEO, to deliberate and decide on issues related to climate change. This committee deliberates and decides on policies and measures, and then reports or submits them to the Board of Directors.
Furthermore, this committee will monitor the progress and results of our materiality, including our decarbonization targets, and report to the Board of Directors at least twice a year, including any need for improvement, and will formulate necessary measures.
The Board of Directors will oversee climate change-related initiatives based on the recommendations/reports submitted by this Committee and will issue instructions as necessary.
The Sustainability Committee is comprised of internal directors, executive officers, and heads of various management departments, with the ESG Promotion Office serving as its secretariat. It also receives advice from external experts as needed. In practice, a Sustainability Subcommittee and a Sustainability Liaison Committee are established under the committee, and these two groups collaborate with each other.
Risk Management
Within our group, we have established "Risk Management Regulations" for various risks, including disaster risks, information risks, employment and personnel risks, as well as environmental risks. We regularly hold a "Compliance and Risk Management Committee" (hereinafter referred to as the Committee) to manage, improve, and strengthen these risks. The Committee is chaired by the President and composed of department heads from our head office.
In addition, we have established a permanent Risk Management Department with 10 members specializing in safety, customs clearance, and quality, three of whom also serve as the secretariat for the committee's operations.
Risk management in sustainability, including climate change, is the responsibility of the Sustainability Committee. As part of this, the Committee monitors the progress of climate change and regulatory trends, and identifies and assesses the financial impacts of climate change-related risks and opportunities under 1.5°C and 4°C scenarios over a medium to long term. The identified risks and opportunities are regularly reassessed by the Committee and reported to or submitted to the Board of Directors at least once a year, where risks are prioritized and decisions are made on how to manage them (mitigate, transfer, accept, or control). By conducting such scenario analyses once a year, climate change-related risks are reviewed regularly.
Furthermore, climate-related risks reported to or submitted to the Board of Directors are reported to the Compliance and Risk Management Committee, and preparations are underway to treat them in the same way as company-wide risks.
Scenario Analysis
Prerequisites for scenario analysis
Our company conducts scenario analyses to assess the medium- to long-term risks and opportunities to our business related to climate change, and to consider countermeasures. This year's analysis focused on our domestic operations alone, identifying risks and opportunities expected to impact us in fiscal years 2030 and 2050, and examining their financial impacts and countermeasures. As assumed scenarios, we considered a 4°C scenario in which existing policies remain unchanged, and a 1.5°C scenario in which decarbonization policies are actively pursued to limit the rise in global average temperature by the end of the 21st century to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
| 1.5℃ Scenario | 4℃ scenario | |
|---|---|---|
| Expected content | This scenario assumes that the introduction of decarbonization measures, regulations, and technological developments will progress in order to limit the rise in the global average temperature by 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels by the end of the 21st century. | This scenario assumes that the global average temperature at the end of the 21st century has risen by 4°C compared to pre-industrial levels, leading to an increase in physical damage from typhoons and other natural disasters. Production, regulations, and technological development are assumed to remain unchanged. |
| Reference scenario * |
|
|
*Summary of the reference scenario:
IEA NZE…A 1.5°C equivalent scenario published by the International Energy Agency (IEA). A scenario in which net-zero emissions are achieved by 2050.
IEA STEPS… A 4°C equivalent scenario published by the International Energy Agency (IEA). This scenario assumes that existing policies remain unchanged without any additional measures.
IPCC… Abbreviation for "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change".
IPCC SSP 1-1.9… An IPCC scenario equivalent to a 1.5°C increase. CO₂ emissions will be virtually zero around 2050, limiting the temperature increase to 1.5°C by the end of the 21st century.
IPCC SSP 5-8.5…IPCC's 4°C equivalent scenario. It assumes that both CO₂ emissions and average temperature will continue to rise, resulting in a temperature increase of 4°C or more by the end of the 21st century.
Scenario analysis implementation process
As part of the scenario analysis, we first listed the climate-related transition risks, physical risks, and opportunities anticipated throughout our entire value chain, and then extracted the items that we considered to have a particularly significant impact on our company. Next, for each of the extracted risks and opportunities, we examined the external environment and our company's situation assumed in the 1.5°C and 4°C scenarios for each target year, referring to the external scenarios, and organized the calculation logic that forms the basis for the financial impact calculation, as well as the internal and external data necessary for the calculation. After actually calculating the financial impact using the collected data, we evaluated the relevant risks and opportunities in three stages from the perspectives of "likelihood of occurrence" and "impact," and conducted an assessment of their importance to our company*. Finally, based on the results of the financial impact calculation and importance assessment, we considered the policy for countermeasures for each item.
*The importance assessment was calculated by multiplying the impact assessment (1-3) and the probability assessment (1-3), and evaluating them in three stages (large, medium, small) based on the matrix diagram shown on the right. The impact assessment was as follows: "1" for impacts of 100 million to 500 million yen on sales or expenses, "2" for impacts of 500 million to 1 billion yen, and "3" for impacts of 1 billion yen or more.
Analysis results of the financial impact
The risks, opportunities, financial impacts, and countermeasures identified through scenario analysis are as follows:
| classification | Anticipated risks and opportunities | Timing of expression *1 | Financial impact *2 *3 | Importance rating *4 | Countermeasures | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium term (2030) | Long term (2050) | Medium term (2030) | Long term (2050) | |||||||||||
| 1.5℃ | 4℃ | 1.5℃ | 4℃ | 1.5℃ | 4℃ | 1.5℃ | 4℃ | 1.5℃ | 4℃ | |||||
| Transition risks | policy· Regulations |
|
middle period | middle period | 11.2 hundred million |
450 million | 0 | 0 | large | small | Medium | small |
|
|
|
Mid-term/ long term |
Mid-term/ long term |
950 million | 550 million | 120 million | 160 million | Medium | small | Medium | small |
|
|||
| Physical risks | acute |
|
- | - | Tokyo area: 0 - Yokohama area: 630 million yen Nagoya area: 8.45 billion yen Osaka area: 4.22 billion yen Kobe area: 10.55 billion yen Fukuoka area: 3.4 billion yen |
Medium | Medium | Medium | large |
|
||||
| opportunity | Resource efficiency |
|
middle period | middle period | 0.6 hundred million |
0.2 hundred million |
0 | 0 | Medium | Medium | - | - |
|
|
| market |
|
Mid-term/ long term |
Mid-term/ long term |
23.6 hundred million |
23.6 hundred million |
836.7 hundred million |
69.5 hundred million |
large | large | large | large |
|
||
*1 "Medium term" refers to 2025-2030, and "long term" refers to 2031-2050. Physical risks are assumed to occur approximately once every 1,000 years, so the financial impact of each occurrence is evaluated.
*2 "Medium term" refers to the annual impact amount calculated for fiscal year 2030, and "long term" refers to the annual impact amount calculated for fiscal year 2050. Physical risk is calculated based on the impact of the maximum assumed storm surge.
*3 -: Negative impact on P/L, +: Positive impact on P/L
*4 Assessment of importance. See "Scenario Analysis Implementation Process" above for the decision-making process.
Indicators and targets
Climate change-related goals
As the global movement towards a decarbonized society accelerates, the Japanese government has also set CO₂ reduction targets to achieve carbon neutrality. In line with the government's targets, our company has set a medium-term target of "reducing CO₂ emissions (domestic Scope 1 + Scope 2) by 46% compared to 2013 levels by fiscal year 2030." We will also continue to consider setting a long-term (fiscal year 2050) target, taking into account the importance of achieving carbon neutrality as a global imperative and considering its effectiveness.
Furthermore, since we began calculating Scope 3 reduction targets in fiscal year 2024, we will continue to consider them in the future.
- Target year: 46% reduction by fiscal year 2030.
- Target year: Carbon neutrality by 2050 (under consideration)
Actual values related to climate change
Our actual CO₂ emissions figures are as follows:
Total CO₂ emissions from our domestic operations (Scope 1, Scope 2)
| 2013 | 2022 | 2023 | FY2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope1 | 31,356.45 | 32,076.58 | 31,655.96 | |
| Scope2 | 55,138.00 | 65,076.00 | 61,452.00 | |
| total | 99,120.00 | 86,494.45 | 97,152.58 | 93,107.96 |
Actual values related to climate change
Breakdown of Scope 3 CO₂ Emissions (FY2024)
| Emissions (t-CO₂e) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1: Purchased Products and Services | 680,142.00 | Category 9: Transportation and Delivery (Downstream) | Not applicable |
| Category 2: Capital Goods | 57,952.00 | Category 10: Processing of sold products | Not applicable |
| Category 3: Fuel and Energy Related | 9,695.00 | Category 11: Use of sold products | Not applicable |
| Category 4: Transportation and Delivery (Upstream) | - | Category 12: Disposal of sold products | - |
| Category 5: Waste | 3,057.00 | Category 13: Leased Assets (Downstream) | 7,140.00 |
| Category 6: Business Trip | 607.00 | Category 14: Franchise | Not applicable |
| Category 7: Employees' Commuting | 2,030.00 | Category 15: Investment | Not applicable |
| Category 8: Leased Assets (Upstream) | Not applicable | Scope 3 Total | 760,623.00 |
*Emissions intensity is calculated using the following method.
Ministry of the Environment: "Emission Intensity Database for Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions, etc., of Organizations Through Supply Chains [Ver. 3.4]"
IDEA [Ver.2.3]
*Calculations are based on domestic Japanese business operations.
Calculation based on the GHG protocol
The calculation period is from April 2024 to March 2025.
*Category 1 is calculated by assigning 26 types of departmental purchase items from the 2024 payment database.
Breakdown of Scope 3 (%)
*Categories 4 and 12 are currently uncalculated due to the difficulty in collecting data.
*Category 8 includes vehicle leases, but fuel is accounted for under Scope 1.
*Category 9 does not involve the sale of products, therefore no shipping or delivery is required.
*Category 10 does not involve the sale of products, therefore no processing is required.
*Category 11 does not involve the sale of products, therefore no waste is generated during use.